Taliban’s Long Island hawala dealer gets off with probation

December 6, 2011

The financial middle man whose services allowed failed terrorist Faisal Shahzad to plant his dud bomb in Times Square has been sentenced to only three months probation on charges that carried a maximum 10 year sentence.

Younis, the Long Island hawaladar

Centereach hawala dealer

Younis could have served as a warning to all illicit money services

It is stunningly myopic that Judge John Keenan sided with defense attorneys Philippe Solages and Gino Giorgini who argued for zero jail time on the flimsy grounds that Long Island hawala dealer Mohammad Younis (not to be confused with international microcredit advocate and suspected embezzler Muhammad Yunus) supposedly “cooperated” with law enforcement.

But the more scandalous head-scratcher is why federal prosecutors, including the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Preet Bharara and Asst. Attorney John Cronan, only pushed for a six month sentence on two charges that each carried up to a five-year sentence.  Mr. Bharara made the news in 2010 for dissolving a successful counterterror section of his office and merging it with a narcotics office.  The non-sentence within the framework of a deal backed by prosecutors would appear to be another Bharara failure to understand that funding terrorism against civilians is no ordinary crime.

The 9/11 Commission identified hawala as a funding method for Al Qaeda leading up to the attacks on the Twin Towers and Pentagon.  But unwilling to ban hawala or even to tax hawala transactions, public policy makers have been at a loss for how to tighten the screws on hawala.

And here came a case sitting on a silver platter.  Mohammad Younis received $12,000 from his brother, a fellow hawaladar in Pakistan, and gave $7,000 of it to Shahzad and $5,000 to somebody else.  According to Bharara, “Shahzad noted that the cash he received from Younis facilitated the attempt.”  The payment, again according to Bharara and Shahzad himself, was arranged by Tehrik-e-Taliban (the Pakistani Taliban).  So here in the middle of a Taliban-funded terror attack was an unlicensed hawala dealer.

U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara

This case presented a fast ball right down the middle for prosecutors:  a clear-cut incident of an unlicensed hawala dealer accepting Taliban money and giving it to a jihadist for an attempted terrorist attack on the U.S.  It was a golden opportunity for federal prosecutors and New York law enforcement to knock it out of the park, and demonstrate the full force of American law.  They could have used the case to set the example to Muslim hawaladars operating throughout the U.S. that they will be prosecuted fully.  But the prosecutors foolishly blinked.

News and law enforcement accounts are unanimous in saying that Younis was unaware that the money would be used for terrorism.  Indeed!  Maintaining deniability is the purpose behind hawala, and is the problem inherent to hawala in terms of terror finance!  Hawala to its very core flouts modern know-your-customer regulations faced by banks and other legitimate money services businesses.  Hawaladars KNOW their transactions fund illegal activity, which is precisely why they do not want to know whom nor what their transactions fund.  To absolve a hawala broker who claims innocence after the fact is to fail to understand the criminally negligent foundations of hawala.

Younis will have to pay a $2,000 fine and forfeit $12,000.  By comparison, a Jewish rabbi in New York convicted on unlicensed money exchange charges earlier this year (in a case that involved zero allegations of funding terrorism) was fined $36,740 and had to forfeit $367,500.  Younis, whose work funded an actual terrorist attempt, will pay only about 3 percent of what Rabbi Kassin was forced to pay.

Often inaccurately described as an “Asian” invention, hawala is a Muslim money transfer system based on the statements and actions of Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, documented in the Hadith.


  1. info & timing – in this particular case I can see how cooperation could have filled in critical information links at a pivotal time in our “overseas contingency operations”

    • Yes, cooperation with law enforcement is helpful and should be rewarded. The 10 year max wouldn’t have been fair under the circumstances.

      But certainly something more than 3 months probation would have sent a much-needed signal to these hawaladars whose money transfers are helping terrorists.

      Split the difference, and the deal should have been 5 years jail time.

  2. […] site. Click to Link to the Home […]

  3. […] method that is often used to fund terrorism.  The Obama administration has been worse, passing up a golden opportunity to seek a maximum penalty against the hawala dealer who funded the failed Times Square […]

  4. Update: New York Jews David S. Goldhirsh and Rabbi Lavel Schwartz were sentenced to a year in prison for a similar offense of transferring money through an unlicensed money services business. See:


    Yet Goldhirsh and Schwartz weren’t even funding terrorism. So Jewish defendants in a similar case get one year in prison, while an unlicensed money services broker who accepted money from the Taliban and gave it to the Faisal Shahzad to bomb Times Square only got 3 months probation!

    This is not fair at all.

  5. […] in prison to supervised release with no prison time.  The sentencing is reminiscent of that of New York hawala dealer Faisal Shahzad, who funded the failed Times Square bomber and got off with […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: